Re: pg_basebackup fails on databases with high OIDs
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup fails on databases with high OIDs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36af18b2-b7ca-7f2d-00f1-8840c2cc8599@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup fails on databases with high OIDs (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup fails on databases with high OIDs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-01-11 17:47, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 5:44 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:21:11AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> On 2020-01-06 21:00, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>>> +0.5 to avoid calling OidInputFunctionCall() >>>> >>>> Or just directly using atol() instead of atoi()? Well maybe not >>>> directly but in a small wrapper that verifies it's not bigger than an >>>> unsigned? >>>> >>>> Unlike in cases where we use oidin etc, we are dealing with data that >>>> is "mostly trusted" here, aren't we? Meaning we could call atol() on >>>> it, and throw an error if it overflows, and be done with it? >>>> Subdirectories in the data directory aren't exactly "untrusted enduser >>>> data"... >>> >>> Yeah, it looks like we are using strtoul() without additional error checking >>> in similar situations, so here is a patch doing it like that. >> >>> - true, isDbDir ? pg_atoi(lastDir + 1, sizeof(Oid), 0) :InvalidOid); >>> + true, isDbDir ? (Oid) strtoul(lastDir + 1, NULL, 10) :InvalidOid); >> >> Looking at some other code, I just discovered the atooid() macro that already >> does the same, maybe it'd be better for consistency to use that instead? > > +1. Whie it does the same thing, consistency is good! :) committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: