Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36E55C73.32A97FD6@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy@druid.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > This appears to be untrue. Is this a change since 6.4 or is there > > > some cases where using CURRENT_TIMESTAMP will not do the expected > > > thing? > This paragraph says that CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is evaluated at the time > the table is defined yet I tested this with a current version and it > actually gets evaluated at INSERT time. You are right; I had changed the parser to force a string into the parse tree rather than a constant. Would you be interested in sending patches for the docs? :) > > > Also, the title of the document (The PostgreSQL Development Team) > > > seems to be incorrect. > > My browser shows that as the second line, just under the title > > "PostgreSQL", as I intended. What browser are you using? > Sorry, my misunderstanding. I didn't realize that PostgreSQL was the > title of this particular document. Anyway, the link to this page is > "Integrated Document" so there is a small inconsistency. The problem is that this is a document integrated from all of the other documents for purposes of HTML formatting and browsing. I wanted to make clear that all of the information appears somewhere in the other documents. - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: