Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36CB862D.22FCF6FA@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] 8K block limit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > But modern Unixes have read/write ahead i/o if it seems a sequential > access, don't they. I did some testing on my LinuxPPC box. > > 0. create table t2(i int,c char(4000)); > 1. time psql -c "copy t2 from '/tmp/aaa'" test > (aaa has 5120 records and this will create 20MB table) > 2. time psql -c "select count(*) from t2" test > 3. total time of the regression test > > o result of testing 1 > > 8K: 0.02user 0.04system 3:26.20elapsed > 32K: 0.03user 0.06system 0:48.25elapsed > > 32K is 4 times faster than 8k! > > o result of testing 2 > > 8K: 0.02user 0.04system 6:00.31elapsed > 32K: 0.04user 0.02system 1:02.13elapsed > > 32K is neary 6 times faster than 8k! Did you use the same -B for 8K and 32K ? You should use 4x buffers in 8K case! Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: