Re: [HACKERS] Keywords
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Keywords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36C1A1AA.92692BE1@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Keywords (Michael Meskes <Michael_Meskes@topmail.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Keywords
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > However, it is handled in a special way: in contexts where one would > > expect a type name, "int" is translated to "int4" explicitly (very > > early on, from gram.y). Otherwise it is not translated. > And int4 is reserved? Is is not in keywords.c though. No! That's the point, really; there are very few keywords which are type names. afaik the only cases where type names show up as keywords are where SQL92 syntax requires special handling, such as "TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE" and "NATIONAL CHARACTER VARYING". And even in those cases I've tried to allow as broad a usage as possible, so even though something is a keyword it may be allowed as a column name, type name, or identifier unless prohibited by the yacc one-token-lookahead limitations. Look in the hardcopy or html User's Guide for the chapter on "Syntax", which lists the SQL92 and Postgres reserved words. I neglected to add that chapter to the "integrated docs" (postgres.html) in the last release, so you will need to look at user.html to find it. Also, it doesn't include recent changes from Vadim et al for MVCC, which I expect will add a few keywords eventually. - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: