Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36B2F091.7EC6EDB1@trust.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > There could be a problem with GUI tools that rely on these rows > > to format their output (like pgaccess or ODBC --> M$ Access) though. > > Oh, never thought of that. A select of pg_class will return no rows for > that table because it is a temp table. One more reson to move \d from psql to backend maybe with syntax like Oracle's "DESC xxx" unless there is something in ANSI standard for that. Or implement the ANSI system tables (I think there were some ;) and views. Then the front-end tools can be advised to use these (and TEMP TABLES can add rows to other (possibly structure-permanent) TEMP tables that are UNIONed withe real pg_class to give them real values. Or we can even implement just temp _rows_ for tables that exist in a session only (maybe like in independant uncommitted transactions), and add the info for temp tables to pg_class (and friends) as temp rows. ---------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: