Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vadim Mikheev
Тема Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed
Дата
Msg-id 36AF5FB9.5F11BBE9@krs.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates.  They should work
> > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.
> 
> Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
> The regression tests look a lot better than they did.  The "union"
> test is still failing by adding a bunch of
> 
>         NOTICE:  equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal
> 
> lines to the expected output.  Anybody know what's causing that?

Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries?
Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746...

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vadim Mikheev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats