Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36A814D9.2D55C3D7@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I just checked the ecpg docs. There are ecpg.1 and ecpg.sgml, a man > > page and a converted texinfo file. I remember Tom saying something > > like the manpages shall be computed from the sgml source. Is this > > correct? > I am wondering myself. Thomas, where are we on this? Can we convert > the html to man pages, or doesn't that work. Fortunately, we have not > been making many man pages changes lately, so it has not been an > issue. I'm waiting for someone to send an updated version of "Instant", which converts DocBook-v3.0 sgml <refentry> pages into man pages. It should show up in a week or two. We'll see if it works well enough. Others have expressed interest in helping, but have not had time to contribute a solution. I personally consider it a second-order problem, in that if we had waited for a perfect man page solution before starting the new docs we wouldn't have any new docs. Also, imho the man pages should be kept very simple, with just syntax and no "how to" info, but I think others don't see it that way so I'm still willing to look into converting the bigger docs back into man pages. Anyway, if someone wants to look at converting html into man pages, be my guest. If it is completely turn-key, then perhaps I could support it for document releases, otherwise someone else will have to take responsibility, and we'll all have to finish release docs a bit earlier than we have been doing. But that's a detail... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: