Re: effective_cache_size
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 369ec766-b947-51bd-4dad-6fb9e026439f@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 16/10/2018 17:38, Bruce Momjian wrote: > diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c > index 2317e8b..e471d7f 100644 > --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c > +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c > @@ -2987,10 +2987,9 @@ static struct config_int ConfigureNamesInt[] = > > { > {"effective_cache_size", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_COST, > - gettext_noop("Sets the planner's assumption about the size of the disk cache."), > - gettext_noop("That is, the portion of the kernel's disk cache that " > - "will be used for PostgreSQL data files. This is measured in disk " > - "pages, which are normally 8 kB each."), > + gettext_noop("Sets the planner's assumption about the size of the data cache."), > + gettext_noop("That is, the size of the cache used for PostgreSQL data files. " > + "This is measured in disk pages, which are normally 8 kB each."), > GUC_UNIT_BLOCKS, > }, > &effective_cache_size, This change completely loses the context that this is the kernel's/host system's memory size. What is "data cache"? I think this is a bad change. I know it's confusing, but the old description at least had some basis in terms that are known to the user. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: