Re: [HACKERS] problem with arrays
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] problem with arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36942014.4B83230A@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | problem with arrays (Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Also trying to define the _varchar or _bpchar types fails, so it seems > that the conversion from 6.2 to 6.4 is not possible for many data > types. Any suggestion? That sucks. afaik the only data types affected are the fixed-maximum with variable-length strings. There was a comment in gram.y from Jolly regarding the possibility for allowing bpchar and varchar into arrays, though she explicitly disallowed it. I had thought that this code is still in effect. I'm not certain how much you have looked at this, but the leading underscore is a Postgres convention for array data types. The trick to allowing bpchar, varchar, and perhaps numeric types into arrays is passing along the element dimensions. I haven't looked at whether that already happens. In the meantime, you can try using the text type instead. I know it doesn't have an 8-byte maximum length, but it is allowed in arrays... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: