Re: libpg: large object problems
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpg: large object problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 368e408ac6c9457106859cd97086d479@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpg: large object problems (Seth Nickell <snickell@stanford.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I'm unfortunately still having problems :-( Can I only do one lo_ > operation per transaction? e.g. is this valid? Perfectly valid. > If I only put one lo_ operation per transaction, I get back "0" for the > fd (is this a valid fd?). Yes, "0" is not only valid, but fairly common, as it is the fist "slot" used for large objects. Other than that, I think you are almost there if you institute the changes Tom mentioned. Particularly, make sure you check the values of the lo_* operations to see if they are returning a negative number. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200305032058 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+tGctvJuQZxSWSsgRAr9aAJ4zX5Kl3TxO6CyzPifuXXGgjH+UUACggNs3 zIwyRHIV2UymA3fCy8miJSY= =NYiw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: