Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches)
От | Goran Thyni |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 368D5B61.A0E1E671@kirra.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XML (was: 2 patches) (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > XML is a buzzword, but it has enormous potential, > > and it is not foreign to the pgsql community since > > we are already using the father of XML (SGML) for > > the docs. > > > > Suggestion: > > CORBA and XML should replace current FE/BE-protocol for v. 7.0 > > Comments? > > I vote against it. Maybe nice to have as an extra, but the base > protocol seems to work well, and is fast. You are right, let me rephrase myself: - the "base protocol" might become obsolite if and when we have a better object base alternative (CORBA and/or XML). - this might be the case for v. 7.0 or later. This is an idea for a game plan: 1. Make a proxy server 2. Integrate it in postmaster when stable (code-wise and protocol-wise) 3. Add closer integration with DB-objects This game plan would perhaps work to get CORBA of the ground too, there might even be sensible to make a common CORBA/XML-proxy. I will look in to this, but will be working out of town for 2 months (mainly feb-mars) so I will not promise anything for 6.5. Any help or input (right now comment on the DTD etc) welcome. regards, -- ----------------- Göran Thyni This is Penguin Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: