Re: Two Flyers
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two Flyers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 367d6aaecb123c5c11b8f281c5880fac@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two Flyers (elein <elein@varlena.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Since I made up the flyers and Varlena, llc is paying for the > copies of both flyers for Oscon, I get to choose the elephant > I like best. > > Anyone else is welcome and encouraged to create and print > their own flyer. This is a strange attitude to take when earlier you said: > Unless people *hate* them, links to these flyers should > be created from *somewhere* on postgresql.org, presumably > the advocacy page, but who knows where would be more > helpful. ...which would assume that these are meant to be taken as official community-sanctioned flyers, regardless of who is paying for them. While the synergy between the community (e.g. pgsql-advocacy) and a commercial company (Varlena LLC) can benefit both parties, there is clearly a delicate balance that must be struck. In this case, I agree with Marc - if you are going to print out and distribute flyers at the PostgreSQL booth at OSCON, and have asked the community to not only proofread but make a prominent link to the flyers, then the community certainly has a right to ask that you put the correct logo on them. If these flyers are meant to be the exclusive property of your company, please let us know up front, so that the community can produce its own non-branded flyer. If you want to sponsor the flyer by having a prominent link to Varlena LLC on the bottom, that's great, but the final determination of the actual content should belong to the community. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFA60zuvJuQZxSWSsgRAvxHAKCCxCIAvb0Q99qNvfX0U8HgxckzHQCeP3a1 IeXptw847eMJ/a9anZ3o3ZM= =BK/I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: