Re: relscan.h split
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relscan.h split |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3678.1213490931@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: relscan.h split (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Also, it seemed like some of those .c files had no business poking into >> the scan structs anyway; particularly contrib. Did you check whether >> the inclusions could be avoided? > Not really, unless we were to provide something a routine that returns > the current block of a scan. Current buffer you mean. That wouldn't be a bad idea --- the wart I added to genam.c the other day to recheck the current tuple could be replaced with that, I think, though it wouldn't really be much less warty. BTW I think your change in pgstattuple.c is probably dangerous: if the relation gets extended between where heap_beginscan_strat sets rs_nblocks and where you put RelationGetNumberOfBlocks, I think the block counting will get messed up. That one really does need access to the internals. Other than that, this looks pretty sane to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: