Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36745CAD.8E4F2EC1@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, we have a bug report against 6.4, so my inclination is to change > it in both trees. We know that the current code is broken on at least > one major platform. I think that outweighs the unproven possibility > that the other way might be broken somewhere... OK, I applied the fix (confined to backend/utils/adt/nabstime.c) to both CVS trees. This swaps the checking of HAVE_INT_TIMEZONE and HAVE_TM_ZONE so that the TM_ZONE takes precedence. This single-file patch should be a candidate for removal if others run into trouble when testing. One thing I wasn't certain about was the use of #error in non-gcc compilers. Is that a standard feature? - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: