Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install'
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 366C80ED.573CABDC@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install' (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install'
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I do...I don't like it when we assume that we're right and the > person installing the software is wrong...usnig AC_PROG_INSTALL should > be sufficient... ... and if it isn't, then perhaps a bunch of #ifdef HPUX ... if (port ~ "HPUX") ... might make it clearer why we made the choice. All of the platforms have their foibles, but some brands don't even give it the old college try on keeping consistancy and standardization between releases and within a release. I'd always liked Dec machines because even through major releases and processor revs they managed binary and environment compatibility. 'Course, fat lot of good it did them *sniff*. HP has binaries which won't run on different processors in the same line, and has system inconsistancies even between v9.01 and v9.02! Who do they think they are, PostgreSQL? :) Anyway, Tom, do you think that the AC_PROG_INSTALL function might help on the HP? If so, we've probably stressed it pretty good... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: