Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 366359CE.E6F2769C@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | COMMIT (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT
Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote: > > Hi, > > while on the redolog, I've came across a little detail I'm in > doubt about. Currently it seems, that the 'C' response to the > frontend is sent before the transaction get's really > committed in the backend. So there is a little chance that > the backend dies between this response and the > CommitTransaction() call. > > Isn't that the wrong order? As a programmer I would assume, > that if I have positive response to COMMIT, I can forget my > local data because it made it safely into the database. Yes, this should be fixed... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: