1.2 JVM and such
От | Dallas Hockley |
---|---|
Тема | 1.2 JVM and such |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3662EB0C.8A0CBDC4@cybersurf.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] 1.2 JVM and such
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Greetings all, Just focusing on a sub topic here. I just browsed the JDBC 2.0 API spec, and it looks like the main issue is ability to compile the driver. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the new Driver, as Peter stated, will largely have *more* methods in the existing classes, and a few new supporting classes and types. The 1.2 JVM will support both drivers, as stated in the spec. I think that the integration of the 1.2/JDBC 2.0 spec into the driver is the "right thing", but the JVM issue is still at the heart of the matter. I think the distribution of the binary classes as both a 1.1x and 1.2 jar file will be needed, due to the post which reflects the reality that not too many of us have multiple JVMs on the platforms. Our shop is using the 1.1 and postgresql pretty intensely here, but if we can move to the 1.2, especially with the additional functionality the JDBC 2.0 spec represents in BLOBs, and fixed meta and type classes, as well as new result sets capabilities, it may be a case where the 1.1 development is frozen except for bug fixes anyway. I don't know if that is the intent, but it makes sense from my point of view. Now, my rambling does have one other purpose. Would a 1.2 compiled binary work on a 1.1 system/app/applet anyway? It appears to me that it would from a theoretical standpoint, as the interface additions and new classes wouldn't be used. However, the internal algorithms and interactions may make the assumption incorrect. Cheers, Dallas
Вложения
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: