Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36517DEF.7989C4EC@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PREPARE ("Taral" <taral@cyberjunkie.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I'm still holding back PREPARE for ecpg until I can think of a > good solution. The best of course would be in the backend. So what would it take to do this in the backend? I think the places which would need to be touched fall into areas I either know about or am starting to look at to implement the CASE clause. We'd need: - a "named buffer" (or several) to hold the intermediate input - a way to pass in parameters or substitution arguments- a way to decide if previous parser/planner/executor results can be reused What else? - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: