Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 363DE1DD.160A368B@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, maybe not, but don't beat yourselves up about it. An awful lot > of small but good things have happened in the last month in the way of > bug fixes and configure improvements. Not to mention docs. If you'd > released 6.4 a month ago, it would've been of substantially lower > quality than what will go out the door this week. I don't think the > delay was such a bad thing. That's been pointed out :) But every release we try to learn something new (or are forced to relearn something old). In this case, imho we delayed focusing the developer's group on release-specific issues while waiting for these additions, and could have/should have covered the same territory starting Sept 1 rather than Oct 15. otoh, you did a lot of these fixes and improvements over the last month, and only you can guess if you would have been prepared/willing/in the right frame of mind to do the same in September. Also, I got some great docs contributions since Sept 15 (about when I had planned on freezing the docs), and those things would have had to wait for v6.5, at least for hardcopy versions. So, the only issue really is trying to be a bit more decisive about which features will go into a release, feature-freezing when we had planned to (more or less), and then doing the right thing for testing and packaging once we have frozen. And then move on to the next release cycle with clear heads and great plans ;) - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: