Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36360F42.AD2AC64@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ... (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I understand that, and I *don't* run it as root, I only install it > as root. After it's installed I chown it to postgres which is what > many other packages do. I also do everything from /usr/local/src/ > instead of /usr/src. IMO, /usr/src is no place for users to be > putting or building files. It's also alot easier to back up the local > tree and be done with it. But these are just my preferences. If > someone else wants to build it in / that's their business. Sorry about that. I agree with you completely (I may even agree with you more than you do! :) I do a _lot_ of postgres building, since developing the server is one of my hobbies. istm it is much cleaner to do everything out of /opt/postgres, owned by postgres (as opposed to scattering things below /, which as you point out can be a mess). I put the builds into directories like v6.3.2 or 981014.d, then point to one with a softlink /opt/postgres/current. Then nothing needs to happen as root for months on end, and I can switch between versions in a minute or two if necessary. I'm not sure what the current thinking is on the /opt concept wrt the newer file system conventions being negotiated between Unices... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: