Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3628.1274029880@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Couldn't you apply this argument to any built-in immutable function whatsoever?
No, only the ones that are built on top of other functions that aren't
immutable.
I did go looking for other potential problems of the same ilk. The only
one I can find at present is to_timestamp(double), which is an immutable
SQL function but it uses timestamptz + interval, which is marked as not
immutable. I believe the reason for that is that if the interval
includes month or day components then the addition result can depend on
the timezone setting. However, the usage in to_timestamp() involves only
a pure seconds component so the immutable marking should be correct.
Still, we might want to think about reimplementing to_timestamp() as a
pure C function sometime, because the current implementation is many
times slower than it needs to be.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: