Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3628.1274029880@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Couldn't you apply this argument to any built-in immutable function whatsoever? No, only the ones that are built on top of other functions that aren't immutable. I did go looking for other potential problems of the same ilk. The only one I can find at present is to_timestamp(double), which is an immutable SQL function but it uses timestamptz + interval, which is marked as not immutable. I believe the reason for that is that if the interval includes month or day components then the addition result can depend on the timezone setting. However, the usage in to_timestamp() involves only a pure seconds component so the immutable marking should be correct. Still, we might want to think about reimplementing to_timestamp() as a pure C function sometime, because the current implementation is many times slower than it needs to be. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: