Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 362570f3-1031-4f8e-a077-81c103200b64@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_trgm comparison bug on cross-architecture replication due to different char implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/3/24 11:44, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 03.05.24 16:13, Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: >>> On 30.04.24 19:29, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Also, the bigger picture here is the seeming assumption that "if >>>> we change pg_trgm then it will be safe to replicate from x86 to >>>> arm". I don't believe that that's a good idea and I'm unwilling >>>> to promise that it will work, regardless of what we do about >>>> char signedness. That being the case, I don't want to invest a >>>> lot of effort in the signedness issue. Option (1) is clearly >>>> a small change with little if any risk of future breakage. >> >>> But note that option 1 would prevent some replication that is currently >>> working. >> >> The point of this thread though is that it's working only for small >> values of "work". People are rightfully unhappy if it seems to work >> and then later they get bitten by compatibility problems. >> >> Treating char signedness as a machine property in pg_control would >> signal that we don't intend to make it work, and would ensure that >> even the most minimal testing would find out that it doesn't work. >> >> If we do not do that, it seems to me we have to buy into making >> it work. That would mean dealing with the consequences of an >> incompatible change in pg_trgm indexes, and then going through >> the same dance again the next time(s) similar problems are found. > > Yes, that is understood. But anecdotally, replicating between x86-64 arm64 is > occasionally used for upgrades or migrations. In practice, this appears to have > mostly worked. If we now discover that it won't work with certain index > extension modules, it's usable for most users. Even if we say, you have to > reindex everything afterwards, it's probably still useful for these scenarios. +1 I have heard similar anecdotes, and the reported experience goes even further -- many such upgrade/migration uses, with exceedingly rare reported failures. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: