Re: pg_dump new -n flag
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump new -n flag |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3617FDA1.57386F2@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump new -n flag
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Did you update the man pages or docs? I don't see the man page > changed. Do you want me to do it? Funny you should ask... I'm just in the process of converting all of the "utilities" man pages to sgml. For this release, we should keep the man pages as-is, but we will have equivalent info in hardcopy and html. So, I haven't updated the man page yet, but I'll do that. I did update the usage printout from pg_dump itself. And, can we be sure to update both sgml and man pages from here to release to keep them in sync? I should be able to commit most sgml sources for the utilities this evening; on my list of "must-haves" just pg_dump, pg_dumpall, and vacuum are left to do. btw, is "-n" an acceptable choice for the flag? I'd be happy with anything, but decided that "-q" probably shouldn't be used since many programs use it to mean "quiet". So -n for "No quotes" is what I chose instead... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: