Re: Some more hackery around cryptohashes (some fixes + SHA1)

On 07/01/2021 05:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:48:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This is a nice cleanup, so I have moved ahead and applied it.  A
>> rebased version of the SHA1 business is attached.
> 
> Rebased version attached to address the conflicts caused by 55fe26a.
> I have fixed three places in pgcrypto where this missed to issue an
> error if one of the init/update/final cryptohash calls failed for
> SHA1.

> diff --git a/contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h b/src/common/sha1_int.h
> similarity index 72%
> rename from contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h
> rename to src/common/sha1_int.h
> index 4300694a34..40fbffcd0b 100644
> --- a/contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h
> +++ b/src/common/sha1_int.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
> +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + *
> + * sha1_int.h
> + *      Internal headers for fallback implementation of SHA1
> + *
> + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2020, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
> + * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
> + *
> + * IDENTIFICATION
> + *          src/common/sha1_int.h
> + *
> + *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + */
> +
>  /*    contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h */
>  /*       $KAME: sha1.h,v 1.4 2000/02/22 14:01:18 itojun Exp $    */

Leftover reference to "contrib/pgcrypto/sha1.h"

Other than that, looks good to me.

- Heikki