Re: Truncate Triggers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Truncate Triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3602.1201287650@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Truncate Triggers (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Truncate Triggers
Re: Truncate Triggers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> There are way too many table privilege bits already; to add more you >> need something a lot stronger than a "might be nice" argument. > People use TRUNCATE whatever we say. If you force people to be table > owners or superusers you merely restrict their security options. By that argument you could justify a separate privilege bit for anything at all, eg, each sub-variant of ALTER TABLE. Please present an actual argument why TRUNCATE should get its own bit. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: