Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3601.24.211.165.134.1119409898.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pl/pgsql: END verbosity (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway said: > In PL/PgSQL, "END LOOP" is used to terminate loop blocks, and "END IF" > is used to terminate IF blocks. This is needlessly verbose: we could > simply accept "END" in both cases without syntactic ambiguity. I'd like > to make this change, so that END can be used to terminate any kind of > block. There's no need to remove support for the present syntax, of > course, so there's no backward compatibility concern. Oracle's PL/SQL > does require "END IF" and "END LOOP", but folks interested in maximum > compatibility can always use those forms if they like. > > Any objections? > I'm unkeen. I see no technical advantage - it's just a matter of taste. We advertise that plpgsql is similar to plsql - we should not do anything to make that less so IMNSHO. Terseness is not always good, redundancy is not always bad. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: