On 3/25/20 9:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 3/25/20 7:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I don't actually see why we need the localhost port at all --- it doesn't
>>> look like this test ever attempts to connect to the server. So couldn't
>>> we just drop that?
>> Seems reasonable. I just tested that and it seems quite happy, so I'll
>> make the change.
> Cool, thanks.
>
> jacana has just exposed a different problem: it's not configured
> --with-openssl, but the buildfarm script is trying to run this
> new test module anyway. I'm confused about the reason.
> "make installcheck" in src/test/modules does the right thing,
> but seemingly that client is doing something different?
>
>
Ugh. I have put in place a hack to clear the error on jacana. Yes, the
client does something different so we can run each module separately.
Trawling through the output and files for one test on its own is hard
enough, I don't want to aggregate them.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services