Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

On 09/25/2017 10:15 AM, Gregory Brail wrote:
> Yes. I'm advocating something "built-in" to Postgres. Any or all of 
> those are likely a great starting point.

I don't see a benefit to having this "in postgres". The whole reason we 
have built out a mature and extensible product is so that not everything 
needs to be in postgres. We instead have a huge landscape of extensions 
created by our community that we don't have to manage in core.

Thanks,

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers