Re: WAL & ZFS
От | Holger Jakobs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL & ZFS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35c98a4b-f7a1-a896-4484-582bbaaffb5b@jakobs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL & ZFS (Rui DeSousa <rui@crazybean.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL & ZFS
Re: WAL & ZFS Re: WAL & ZFS |
Список | pgsql-admin |
The WAL is a journal itself and doesn't need another journal for safety. Therefore, a common recommendation is using ext2 (which has no journal) for the WAL partition. Is this correct? Am 31.03.22 um 23:32 schrieb Rui DeSousa: > I would recommend a separate pg_wal filesystem with the record size to match the WAL page size; in my case 16k. I havekeep the default record size at 128k for the data volume and that configuration has worked well for supporting largeDSS while using 16k data blocks. > >> On Mar 30, 2022, at 5:32 PM, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> wrote: >> >> I've read all the info I could find re running PG on ZFS: turn off full page writes, turn on lz4, tweak recordsize soas to take advantage of compression, etc. One thing I haven't seen is whether a separate volume for WAL would benefit froma larger recordsize. Or any other tweaks??? >> >> -- >> Scott Ribe >> scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/ >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
Вложения
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: