Re: Verify true root on replicas with amcheck
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Verify true root on replicas with amcheck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35b5da2e-2ef3-18b0-ba1a-bcb6cdf50741@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Verify true root on replicas with amcheck (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/16/20 7:40 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:55 AM godjan • <g0dj4n@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I heard that amcheck has an invariant about locking no more than 1 page at a moment for avoiding deadlocks. Is there possiblea deadlock situation? > > This is a conservative principle that I came up with when I wrote the > original version of amcheck. It's not strictly necessary, but it > seemed like a good idea. It should be safe to "couple" buffer locks in > a way that matches the B-Tree code -- as long as it is thought through > very carefully. I am probably going to relax the rule for one specific > case soon -- see: > > https://postgr.es/m/F7527087-6E95-4077-B964-D2CAFEF6224B@yandex-team.ru > > Your patch looks like it gets it right (it won't deadlock with other > sessions that access the metapage), but I hesitate to commit it > without a strong justification. Acquiring multiple buffer locks > concurrently is worth avoiding wherever possible. I have marked this patch Returned with Feedback since it has been sitting for a while with no response from the author. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: