Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35F61B38.FFC59D61@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Thanks so much. Now index problems have gone from my LinuxPPC box! Whoo hoo! Thanks Vadim! Indices are much happier on my Linux box also :) > Only remaining problem seems somewhat related to view. Still the > select_views test and "select * from pg_user" produces core dumps. Sadly, that is still true also. As I mentioned earlier, the actual segfault happens when memory is free'd toward the end of a query. But of course there is some problem earlier when the memory was allocated... This is probably unrelated, but is it expected that the system views have rule names prefixed with "_ret" whereas a view I create myself has a name prefixed with "_RET"? Should initdb surround some of these names in double quotes while it is doing its brute-force shadowing? - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: