Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion)
От | David Hartwig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35E45C29.2D25FD42@insightdist.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Regression test status (was type coersion) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > These results are also correct. Somewhat. I do not know much about > > datatime porting issues, but if I do a: > > SELECT d1 FROM DATETIME_TBL > > I get time reported to the 1/100 of a second. If GROUP BY d1 the > > hundredths are not shown. Thus, the counts and groupings are correct. > > Its just not showing the hundredths portion. > > The issue here is why you (or whoever it was prepared the regression > test) got different results from me... > I do get the same results - on my RS/6000. And I did not prepare the test. But, to be more precise: 1. The failure does not indicate any problems w/ the HAVING clause. 2. This test will never work if there is a machine dependence on the ability to resolve datatime down to the 1/100 second. 3. There appears to be something strange going on in the way GROUPed BY datetime columns do not display the 1/100 portion of seconds. Is this a known problem? Unless someone objects, I will submit a test suit to, at least remove the false reading on select_having.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: