Re: partial "on-delete set null" constraint
От | Alban Hertroys |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partial "on-delete set null" constraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35D8084A-00DF-4FD8-AB5D-71846EF952AE@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partial "on-delete set null" constraint (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: partial "on-delete set null" constraint
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> On 03 Jan 2015, at 14:11, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 02 Jan 2015, at 13:31, Rafal Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu> wrote: >> Would it violate SQL standard (signifficantly), if an "on delete set null" action just ignored all the FK columns thathave a "NOT NULL" constraint set? > > As I understand it, this is precisely why Boyce-relationality forbids NULLs in primary keys, although I’m not so sure he’sright about that. Well, that’s embarrassing, it’s only a few weeks since I learned this and I’m already attributing the theory to the wrongdatabase deity! That’s Codd-relationality, of course. Not Boyce. Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: