Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35D79293.82F44A03@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status?
Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] So what is the current documentation status? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I really like libpq.3 as a manual page. I use it for quick reference. > I have printf as a manual pages, and that is a library function. > How is libpq.3 different? printf == single function libpq == entire library of functions It should be noted that many people have trouble giving up man pages. But we have limited resources for documentation, and man pages clearly fall at the bottom of the list in usefulness and viability (at least for things like full library interfaces). We should choose the most appropriate format for each of our documentation resources, at least until we have the documentation under control. There is someone working on a man page output from the sgml, and if that comes through then this is pretty much a moot point. btw, had a chance to look at the new reference pages? They are near the end of the User's Guide on the web site and in /pub/patches on the ftp site. - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: