Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35C327DC.9F87D7C6@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 6.4 Aggregate Bug (David Hartwig <daybee@bellatlantic.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Aggregate Bug
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> While testing my 6.4 patch to allow functions/expressions to be > specified in the ORDER/GROUP BY clause (and not in the target list) I > came across a nasty little bug. > I backed out my patch, and discovered the bug was still present. The > bug does not exist in version 6.3.2. Nor in my cvs tree from around the second week in July (on or before July 9, with a few patches committed to the Postgres tree afterwards). Haven't tried a current source tree... - Tom > > -- This crashes the backend > select upper(a) as x, count(k) from t group by x; tgl=> create table t (a text, k int); CREATE tgl=> select upper(a) as x, count(k) from t group by x; x|count -+----- | 0 (1 row) tgl=> insert into t values ('one', 1); INSERT 643434 1 tgl=> insert into t values ('two', 2); INSERT 643435 1 tgl=> insert into t values ('two', 2); INSERT 643436 1 tgl=> select upper(a) as x, count(k) from t group by x; x |count ---+----- ONE| 1 TWO| 2 (2 rows) And with your test case instead: tgl=> select upper(a) as x, count(k) from t group by x; x|count -+----- A| 4 B| 3 C| 3 (3 rows)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: