Re: [INTERFACES] "static" libraries?
От | Jeffrey Napolitano |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] "static" libraries? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35B4ADF3.5110C2D8@setech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] "static" libraries? (Peter T Mount <peter@taer.maidstone.gov.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] "static" libraries?
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
And the application (let's say java_app.jar) can be invoked directly by name? i.e.: /usr/local/bin/java_app.jar ? Thanx > > [email problems within maidstone.gov.uk has delayed this response - > peter] > > On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Dallas Hockley wrote: > > > Jeffrey Napolitano wrote: > > > > > > I have a Java application which uses JDBC, and it is going to put on a > > > few different machines using postgres and postgres's JDBC driver. My > > > question is this: Is there a method of *including* the JDBC driver into > > > the Java application? An equivalent to statically linking a library in > > > > > > This can be done by "unjarring" the postgresql jdbc driver jar in the > > base class directory of your app/let and then jar'ring the entire > > distribution into one file. The relative class resolution must be > > correct, and it will work.... > > It will work that way. > > The down side to this is that if a newer version of the driver is > released, then you have to rebuild your application jar file. > > -- > Peter Mount (at work) peter@taer.maidstone.gov.uk or peter@maidstone.gov.uk > If you mail me here, please cc my home address peter@retep.org.uk ------------------- Jeffrey Napolitano Lowly Intern Software Emancipation Technology
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: