Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35A4D2DA.2D066E6C@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I am curious though. Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to > your latest 6.4 tree? This patch should have been already part of > the latest 6.4. And, to my knowledge, it was already applied > completely and successfully. I did my final tests using a fresh cvs tree two days ago just before committing my big "patch wad". In the last two or three weeks I did have a "merge problem" with my patches in the resjunk area, which might have been the patches you are talking about. > Now that I think of it, though, this version of the patch does not > include the new "output" and "sql" files necessary for the regression > test. In any case, I should clean that up. I am in the process of renaming and moving the "resjunk" test to "select_implicit". Will try to commit the changes this morning so it is available to you. At the moment, all regression tests (except "random") pass on my Linux box :) - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: