Re: AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3580DE5E.7D57923A@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Zeugswetter wrote: > > > Yep, I think this is do'able, UNLESS Vadim decides he needs to change > > the structure of the data/index files. At that point, we are lost. > > > In the past, we have made such changes, and they were very much needed. > > Not sure about the 6.4 release, but no such changes have been made yet. > > I thought Vadim was going to change the oid in btree index files to ctid, > in my opinion a very useful change. (Or was he intending to add it ?) > Then a btree index rebuild would be necessary. OID was removed from btree tuples ~ year ago. Now I want to use heap tuple ID (referenced by index tuple) as (last) part of index key and get rid of BT_CHAIN flag: all keys will be UNIQUE and there will be no problems with handling duplicate keys any more (idea (C) Oracle -:) But this means that heap tuple id will be added to index tuples on internal pages, not on the leaf ones... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: