Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35631.199.90.235.43.1056031956.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release). Just a thought. andrew Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >> Well, I suppose that history has shown that waiting on specific >> features causes trouble with postgresql development, but I don't see >> why a release can't be based around waiting for feature x as long as >> feature x is being actively worked on by trusted developers who have >> an endgame in sight. > > We have been led down that garden path before, and it's been a losing > proposition every time. >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: