Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] money or dollar type
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] money or dollar type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35584B94.E7037485@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] money or dollar type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> I've just finished working on the type >> conversion algorithms so understand the current "atttypmod" field a >> bit better, but have not decided how to extend it to multiple fields. > divide it into two 16 bit integers ? At the moment it already _is_ a 16 bit integer, so it would have to be divided into two 8 bit integers. Still OK, but then it must be a positive number, so one field can be only 7 bits. I was thinking of trying to solve the problem generally so that a type definition can also define a "type support type" similar to the current atttypmod, but which could be single or multiple numbers, or a string, or... Don't know if it would be generally useful though; still thinking about how to implement different character sets and collation sequences for strings and it seems like this might help. > A mathematical package exists for infinite scale decimals, I think > it was part of a 56 bit RSA cracking effort. It has all thinkable > operations defined... Well, if you find it again let us know ;) In the meantime, the 64-bit integers are probably the best candidate implementation. - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: