Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?
От | Bruce Korb |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3550E86B.F5347A34@datadesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail?
Re: [HACKERS] OK to send e-mail? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > Thus spake ocie@paracel.com > > solution is to make spamming unprofitable. One thing that would go a > > long way is to reverse-verify the sender's address. If the sender has > > forged this, the mail is dropped and we get the sound of one spam > > clapping :) The problem is that most sites nowadays won't verify email > > addresses. This sounds like a good project for a free relational > > database. Anybody know of any good ones out there? :) Somebody out there wrote a program that puts new emailers mail into purgatory until they respond to an automated request to verify. After a while, purgatory gets purged. If they reply, tho, then the message is released.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: