Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc and Visual Basic
От | David Hartwig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc and Visual Basic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3544B82F.A48F95B6@insightdist.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Odbc and Visual Basic (Sbragion Denis <infotecn@tin.it>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
See Byron's posting on this subject. We are getting some interesting result from our yet-to-be-posted hacks. The cool part is that, MS Access no longer requests the user to tag the primary key at link time. The downside, though, is that it has a higher potential for exposing a known bug in the backend's optimizer. The bug has to with multipart keys and the large numbers of ANDs and ORs generated in a single statement while browsing tables. Sbragion Denis wrote: > Hello, > > At 08.14 27/04/98 -0400, David Hartwig wrote: > >Here is an excerpt from the soon to be published ODBC FAQ. > > > >How do I get my application to recognize primary keys? > > > >SQLPrimaryKeys() is implemented in the driver. As of the driver's > release, however, > ... > > Unfortunately VB 5.0 seems to ignore the SQLPrimaryKey() call and insists > looking for a unique index. It was the first thing I tried when I saw the > announce for the support of that call. I also know that the concept of > Primary Key is different from the concept of Unique Index (though on most > database system, including PostgreSQL, the Primary Key concept is > implemented using unique indexes), and using the SQLPrimaryKey() call would > be The Right Way To Do Things (tm), but as long as Microsoft doesn't > understand it... I don't know what would have happened if the ODBC > interface specification have come from someone else than Microsoft itself... >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: