Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem solved
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem solved |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3536.927234621@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.4.2 connection problem solved (Andy Farrell <andy_farrell@itd.sterling.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andy Farrell <andy_farrell@itd.sterling.com> writes: > The machine we tried to run postgres on had the 'localhost' entry in > its hosts file spelled incorrectly (i.e., 'localhosts'). After > updating the hosts file, postgres ran fine. That makes sense, if you were using TCP connection protocol rather than a Unix-domain socket... > I would have thought we would have recieved an error other than > 'getprotobyname failed'. I'll say. How the heck did it manage to get through gethostbyname() and connect(), which are the routines that *should* have failed, and then spit up at getprotobyname() (which should be nothing more than a simple scan of /etc/protocols, and should certainly not care what is in /etc/hosts)? There is more than meets the eye here. If you have time, would you restore /etc/hosts to its broken condition and trace through connectDB a little more carefully? I would like to know what *really* went wrong. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: