Re: [HACKERS] lex/flex portability PB in version 6.3.1
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] lex/flex portability PB in version 6.3.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3528E104.357B7D3D@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] lex/flex portability PB in version 6.3.1 (Andrew Martin <martin@biochemistry.ucl.ac.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > in version 6.3.1 of the file src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/pgc.l . > > > There are some flex specific code . > > > like : > > > %option ( no fatal ) > > > <<EOF>> ( fatal error ) > > Actually, I hate to say it, but its pretty much recommended that > > anyone using PostgreSQL use flex/bison...in particular, we're > > starting to find that 'stock yacc' on some systems chocks on gram.y, > > because its just gotten to be *very* large... > 6.3.1 now breaks under Irix lex as well. > If we're going to REQUIRE flex rather than lex, this MUST be made > clear in the installation docs!!!! We do not (or should not, rather) _require_ flex for an installation. We started shipping the flex output for the main scanner after we started using "exclusive states" (unsupported in old AT&T lexers) to simplify the scanner code. Similarly, we ship the bison output for the parser. Michael, if these flex features are not adding capability, can you remove them? If they are very helpful, then can we start including the pgc.c flex output in patches and into the distribution? We would need to change the Makefile to keep it from deleting pgc.c when doing a "make clean". We also need to be careful that the file creation times on the files in the cvs tree are in the proper order so that make won't try recreating the output... - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: