Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3527BA0A.71FCB42D@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > indexes not used that were used in 6.2(fixed) > > > > memory leak in backend when run on simple queries(fixed) > > > > negative sign causing problems in various areas > > > > configure assert checking is reversed > > > > UNION crashes on ORDER BY or DISTINCT > I would think we are safer by releasing a new diff. The char2-16 > changes are the only ones I know of that should not have been applied > (by me!), so we can back them out. Just seems it is too easy to miss > some part of the patch. Well, we have the other side of the problem to worry about too: that with changes in the source tree, there may be unanticipated interactions with other patches when we are really trying to fix only 5 specific problems. I would like to do a test with specific patches on a clean v6.3.1 installation, and then we can compare the patches from my test with patches from the CVS extraction. I'll isolate my "negative sign" fixes (which I haven't yet committed to the source tree, but which I think just need a reversion of scan.l/scan.c to the v6.3 release). Can you (re)send me the patches for these others? I still have the "memory leak" patches, but can't remember who posted the "index" and "UNION" patches (were they all yours Bruce?? Probably gone from my mail anyway). - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: