Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work?
От | Vadim B. Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35278977.BFC88880@sable.krasnoyarsk.su обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Then I ran profiling on the two queries I mentioned, where one leaks and > one doesn't, and found that the leaking one had 500 extra calls to > malloc. Grep'ing out the calls and comparing the output of the two > profiles, I found: > > 0.00 0.00 1/527 ___irs_gen_acc [162] > 0.00 0.00 35/527 _GetDatabasePath [284] > 0.00 0.00 491/527 _GetDatabaseName [170] > [166] 0.8 0.00 0.00 527 _strdup [166] > 0.00 0.00 527/2030 _malloc [105] > 0.00 0.00 527/604 _strlen [508] > 0.00 0.00 527/532 _bcopy [515] > > I believe this code was modified by Vadim to fix our problem with blind > write errors when using psql while the regression tests were being run. > > Am I correct on this? I have not developed a fix yet. Only src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c:mdblindwrt() was changed... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: