Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3514.1258128505@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Listen / Notify rewrite (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > The problem with this (which I basically agree with) is that this will > greatly increase the size of the queue for all participants of this > feature if they use the payload or not. I think it boils down to > this: is there a reasonably effective way of making the payload > variable length (now or in the future)? If not, let's compromise and > maybe go with a larger size, maybe 256 or 512 bytes. Yeah, if the payload is not variable length then we are not going to be able to make it more than a couple hundred bytes without taking a significant performance hit. (By the way, has anyone yet tried to compare the speed of this implementation to the old code?) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: