Re: has_table_priviledge
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: has_table_priviledge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3514.1051227534@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: has_table_priviledge (ahoward <ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: has_table_priviledge
|
Список | pgsql-general |
ahoward <ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov> writes: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote: >> It does work, for me. What PG version are you using, exactly? > PostgreSQL 7.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96 Ah. I see it too on 7.2. It looks like the 7.2 parser is choosing has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) in preference to has_table_privilege(name, name, text). I can get it to work on 7.2 by putting in an explicit cast, ie, making the constraint read constraint c check (has_table_privilege(user, relname::name, 'update')) Probably the reason 7.3 doesn't misbehave is that its function is declared has_table_privilege(name, text, text). That affects the decision because 'text' is a preferred type and 'name' isn't. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: