Re: pgsql: psql: Add test for query canceling
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: psql: Add test for query canceling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 350197.1629824350@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: psql: Add test for query canceling (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: psql: Add test for query canceling
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Here is a proposal. It waits separately for the pid file to appear and > also checks for the sleep query to be registered by the backend, so it > doesn't have any more dependencies on things happening "fast enough". > And it's also faster in the normal case now. Thoughts? That looks pretty solid to me, and I can confirm that it passes on wrasse's host. The only nit I can find to pick is that this: + usleep(10_000) until -s "$tempdir/psql.pid" or ($count++ > 180 * 100 and die 'pid file did not appear'); basically assumes that psql.pid will be written atomically. It'd be marginally safer to wait till psql.pid can be seen to contain a newline. I don't think that would be too hard to do, if you put the slurp_file call inside the wait loop and inspect its result. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: