Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
От | Alex Hunsaker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 34d269d41002251129j743c55e6jb7f8e57d4079113d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes: >> 3) patch postgres to fix the recursive issue (What I'm leaning towards) >> [ fixes both issues ] > > How exactly would you propose doing that? Well that's the thing, probably by what I described below that. Namely get something working for 9.1 and after we know its good and solid see if we can back patch it. Unfeasible? If its really really simple and straight forward maybe we can find a -commiter willing to commit it sooner. But I'm dubious. I think the feeling between me and Tim is patching postgres is a last resort... Maybe if its to fix both sort {} and this it might be worth it. (That's at least how I parsed what you said :) ). Ill see if I can figure something out via straight Safe tonight.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: